Indexicals and Demonstratives

Eros Corazza
Table of contents

In thinking and talking about items in our surroundings, we often rely on the context of use and thought. We thus succeed in talking and thinking about something because we are in a given context. We are, we could say, context-bound creatures. We share that with other organisms. Yet language is species-specific. And natural languages such as French, English or Japanese, could not be conceived independently of the context in which utterances are produced. First of all, in natural languages we have tools whose specific function is to exploit the context of use in order to select the things we aim to talk about. We can use the very same words and yet refer to very different things, just as we can use the same hammer to nail different nails. When you use ‘I’ you refer to yourself, whereas when I use it, I refer to myself. I cannot refer to you using ‘I’. We use the very same linguistic expression with the same conventional meaning to refer to different individuals. It depends on who uses it that determines who the referent is.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Barwise, J. & J. Etchemendy
1987The liar: An essay on truth and circularity. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R.
2002Thoughts and utterances. Blackwell.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N.
1966‘He’: A study in the logic of self-consciousness. Ratio 8: 130–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1967Indicators and quasi-indicators. American Philosophical Quarterly 4: 85–100. Reprinted in H.-N. Castañeda (1989): 206–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1968On the logic of attributions of self-knowledge to others. The Journal of Philosophy 65: 439–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983Knowledge and self: A correspondence between R.M. Adams and H.-N. Castañeda. In J. Tomberlin (ed.). Agent, language, and the structure of the world, 293–309. Hackett Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989Thinking, language, and experience. The University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, E.
2002Temporal indexicals and temporal terms. Synthese 130(3): 441–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002‘She’ and ‘He’: Politically correct pronouns. Philosophical Studies 111(2): 173–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003Complex demonstratives qua singular terms. Erkenntnis 59(2): 263–283.  TSBGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004On the alleged ambiguity of ‘now’ and ‘here’. Synthese 138: 289–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism”. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(1): 115–37  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, E. & J. Dokic
2007Sense and insensitivity: or where minimalism meets contextualism”. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.). Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays in semantics and pragmatics, 169–193. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devlin, K.
1991Logic and information. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, G.
1919Thought. In M. Beaney (ed.) 1997 The Frege reader, 325–345. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauker, C.
2003Words without meaning. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Y.
2000Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.
1977Demonstratives. In J. Almog et al. (eds.) 1989 Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989Afterthoughts. In J. Almog et al. (eds.) 1989 Themes from Kaplan, 565–614. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, J.
2001Complex demonstratives.MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kripke, S.
1977Speaker's reference and semantic reference. In P.A. French et al. (eds.) 1979 Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language, 6–27. University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, H.
1976Remarks on Coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2: 1–22. Reprint in H. Lasnik (1989). Essays on anaphora, 90–109. Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, D.
1979Scorekeeping in a language game. In D. Lewis 1983 Philosophical papers 1, 233–249. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macfarlane, J.
2005Making sense of relative truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007Semantic minimalism and nonindexical contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.). Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays in semantics and pragmatics, 240–250. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese 166: 231–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, J.
1977Frege on demonstratives. The Philosophical Review 86(4): 474–97. Reprinted in J. Perry (2000). The problem of the essential indexical and other essays, 1–26. CSLI Publications.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986Thought without representation. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society 60: 137–52. Reprinted in J. Perry (1993). The problem of the essential indexical and other essays, 205–225. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001Reference and reflexivity. CSLI Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Predelli, S.
1998Utterance, interpretation, and the logic of indexicals. Mind and Language 13(3): 400–414 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005aContexts, meaning, truth, and the use of language. Oxford University Press.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005bPainted leaves, context, and semantic analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, F.
2003Direct reference. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007Perspectival thought. A plea for (moderate) relativism. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008Moderate relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kolbel (eds.) Relative truth, 41–62. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.
1947Elements of symbolic logics. Free Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidelle, A.
1991The answering machine paradox. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 81(4): 525–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Q.
1989The multiple use of indexicals. Synthese 78: 167–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SperberD. & D. Wilson
Stanley, J.
2000Context and logical form. Linguistics & Philosophy 23: 391–434.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R.
1974Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz & P. Unger, P. (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press. Reprinted in R. Stalnaker (1998). Context and content, 47–62. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallée, R.
2003Context-sensitivity beyond indexicals. Dialogue 42: 79–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue