Interactional sociolinguistics

Jef Verschueren

Table of contents

References
Related articles

As a research tradition, interactional sociolinguistics grew out of the ethnography of speaking, ethnomethodology and cognitive anthropology (with clear Batesonean influences), and it overlaps considerably with certain trends in conversation analysis, discourse analysis, and anthropological linguistics. In particular, more than the major types of conversation analysis, it may be the sociolinguistic application par excellence of basic ethnomethodological tenets (such as the local and situated nature of the creation of meaning, the extra ‘work’ done by interactants in face-to-face settings on top of what is already given in ‘rules’, the reflexive relationship between context and verbal behavior). It is not surprising, therefore, that in principle the term covers a wider area than just those research endeavors directly associated with the label (see, e.g., Schiffrin 1993 for a more extensive discussion). The label was introduced by John Gumperz (1982a) to describe a type of work he and a number of other linguists and anthropologists had been doing for about a decade at the intersection between sociolinguistics and anthropological linguistics, in particular with reference to problems of linguistic and cultural relativity and interethnic or intercultural communication. It was meant to describe interpretive sociolinguistic approaches to the analysis of real time processes of negotiating shared understandings in face-to-face encounters.

References

Akinnaso, F.N. & C. Seabrook Ajirotutu

1982 Performance and ethnic style in job interviews. In J.J. Gumperz (ed.): 119–144.

Atkinson, J.M.

1992 Displaying neutrality. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.): 199–211.

Auer, P. & A. Di Luzio

(eds.) 1992 The contextualization of language. John Benjamins. BoP

Button, G.

1992 Answers as interactional products. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.): 212–231.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & M. Selting

(eds.) 1994 Prosody in conversation. Cambridge University Press. BoP

Drew, P.

1992 Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.): 470–520. BoP

Drew, P. & J. Heritage

(eds.) 1992 Talk at work. Cambridge University Press. BoP

Duranti, A. & C. Goodwin

(eds.) 1992 Rethinking context. Cambridge University Press. BoP

Gumperz, J.J.

1982a Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

1982b Fact and inference in courtroom testimony. In J.J. Gumperz (ed.): 163–195.

(ed.) 1982 Language and social identity. Cambridge University Press.

Heller, M.

1982 Bonjour, hello? Negotiation of language choice in Montreal. In J.J. Gumperz (ed.): 121–130.

Heath, C.

1992 The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.): 235–267.

Hinnenkamp, V.

1991 Talking a person into interethnic distinction. In J. Blommaert & J. Verschueren (eds.), The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication: 91–110. John Benjamins. BoP

Jupp, T.C., C. Roberts & J. Cook-Gumperz

1982 Language and disadvantage. In J.J. Gumperz (ed.): 232–256.

Roberts, C., E. Davies & T.C. Jupp

1992 Language and discrimination. Longman.

Roberts, C. & P. Sayers

1987 Keeping the gate. In K. Knapp, W. Enninger & A. Knapp-Potthoff (eds.), Analyzing intercultural communication: 111–135. Mouton de Gruyter.

Schiffrin, D.

1993 Discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. BoP

Tannen, D.

(ed.) 1993 Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford University Press. BoP

Young, L.W.L.

1994 Crosstalk and culture in Sino-American communication. Cambridge University Press.