Attention and language

Maxim I. Stamenov & Elena Andonova
Table of contents

The topic of attention in relation to language has the potential for uniting the efforts of linguists and cognitive psychologists. Our presentation will be oriented toward their relationship at the level of simple sentence planning and comprehension, since this is a critical level of modeling. Modeling the dynamics of focusing in discourse processing (cf. Kendon 1992; Stevenson, Crawley & Kleinman 1994; Chafe 1994; van Dijk 1997; Stamenov & Andonova 1998) should have as its basis the relationships between the structure of attention and sentence structure. We will consider the functioning of attention in normal language use only, while there is also an extensive literature on different issues of the pathology of attention in language use (cf. Widlöcher & Hardy-Bayle 1989; Bates et al. 1995; Chapman & Ulatowska 1997 for further orientation).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Baddeley, A.
1989 The uses of working memory. In Solomon et al.: 107–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995 Working memory. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.) The cognitive neurosciences: 755–764. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., Ch. Harris, V. Marchman, B. Wulfeck & M. Kritchevsky
1995 Production of complex syntax in normal ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 487–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, L.
1986 Italian syntax. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chapman, S. & H. Ulatowska
1997 Discourse in Dementia: Consideration of consciousness. In Stamenov (ed.): 155–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1990 Accessibility ‘in principle’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 600–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1987 Consciousness and the computational mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990 Semantic structures. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jonides, J. & E.E. Smith
1997 The architecture of working memory. In M. Rugg (ed.) Cognitive neuroscience: 243–276. Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, D.
1973 Attention and effort. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
1992 The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In A. Duranti & Ch. Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon: 326–334. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995 Conceptual grouping and constituency in cognitive grammar. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm 3: 149–172. Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1995 Three levels of meaning. In F.R. Palmer (ed.) Grammar and meaning: 90–115. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, G.
1985 Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 Memory: Conscious and unconscious. In Solomon et al. (eds.): 84–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R.
(ed.) 1998 The attentive brain. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pashler, H.E.
1997 The psychology of attention. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radford, A.
1997 Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanford, A. & S. Garrod
1994 Selective processing in text understanding. In M. Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics: 699–719. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solomon, P.R., R. Paul et al..
(eds.) 1989 Memory: Interdisciplinary approaches. Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stamenov, M.I.
1997a Grammar, meaning and consciousness: What sentence structure can tell us about the structure of consciousness. In Stamenov (ed.) 1997b: 277–342.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stamenov, M.I
(ed.) 1997b Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stamenov, M.I. & E. Andonova
1998 Lexical access and coreference processing in Bulgarian. In D. Hillert (ed.) Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective: 167–181. Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A.
1997 Cognitive context models and discourse. In Stamenov (ed.): 189–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevenson, R., R.A. Crawley & D. Kleinman
1994 Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 519–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996 The windowing of attention in language. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning: 235–287. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widlߞcher, D. & M.-C. Hardy-Bayle
1989 Cognition and control of action in psychopathology. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 9: 583–615.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue