Speech act theory

Marina Sbisà
Table of contents

Many problems that we now consider as proper to speech act theory have already been formulated or at least hinted at on other occasions during the history of Western philosophy and linguistics. Philosophers have been concerned with the relation between the meaning of words, the expression of a proposition, and the act of assertion. Aristotle distinguished between the meaning of words and the assertiveness of declarative sentences (Perí Hermeneias 16b 26–30). Philosophers of language, rhetoricians and linguists have been aware of the variety of uses or functions of language. The Greek sophist Protagoras was probably the first to classify modes of discourse which roughly corresponded to kinds of speech acts; the theory of language of the Stoics, which was to become very influential for the development of grammatical studies, distinguished judgements, which alone are true or false, from wh-questions, polar questions, imperatives and expressions of wish, correlating their function with their grammatical form.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Alston, W.P.
2000 Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apel, K.O.
1991 Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning? In E. Lepore & R. Van Gulick (eds.): 31–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, N. & A. Lascarides
2001 Indirect speech acts. Synthese 128: 183–228.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1946 Other Minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Suppl. vol. 20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1961 Philosophical papers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1962 How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, K. & R.M. Harnish
1979 Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ballmer, T.T. & W. Brennenstuhl
1981 Speech act classification. Springer.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E.
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, I. et al.
1973 Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, M.
(ed.) 1964 Philosophy in America. Allen & Unwin.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House & G. Kasper
(eds.) 1989 Cross-cultural pragmatics. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.) 1989 Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House & G. Kasper (eds.): 1–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S.C. Levinson
1978 Universals in language usage. In E.N. Goody (ed.): 56–289.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987 Politeness. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, K.
1934 Sprachtheorie. Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelen, H. & E. Lepore
2005 Insensitive semantics: a defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Blackwell.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, C.
1999 On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881–909.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, P.R., J. Morgan & M.E. Pollack
(eds.) 1990 Intentions in communication. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, P. & J.L. Morgan
(eds.) 1975 Syntax and Semantics 3. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W.
1994 Sentence typology and the taxonomy of speech acts. In S.L. Tsohatzidis (ed.): 460–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, D.
1979 Moods and performances. In A. Margalit (ed.): 9–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984 Truth and interpretation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
1988 Intention, language and social action in a Samoan context. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 13–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. & R. Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FetzerA. & C. Meierkord
(eds.) 2002 Rethinking sequentiality. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, G.
1879 Begriffsschrift. Nebert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1918 Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung. Beitraege zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1(2): 58–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.
1979 Pragmatics. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981 Speech act assignment. In A.K. Joshi, B.L. Webber & I.A. Sag (eds.): 64–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geis, M.L.
1995 Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goody, E.N.
(ed.) 1978 Questions and politeness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M.S.
2000 Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics & Philosophy 23: 435–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1957 Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975 Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.): 41–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hausendorf, H. & A. Bora
(eds.) in press Analysing citizenship talk John Benjamins  BoP
Holmes, J.
1984 Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–365.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobs, R.A. & P.S. Rosenbaum
(eds.) 1970 Readings in English transformational grammar. Ginn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joshi, A.K., B.L. Webber & I.A. Sag
(eds.) 1981 Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katriel, T. & M. Dascal
1989 Speaker’s commitment and involvement in discourse. In Y. Tobin (ed.): 275–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G.N.
1983 Principles of pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepore, E. & R. Van Gulick
(eds.) 1991 John Searle and his critics. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J.
1977 Semantics. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margalit, A.
(ed.) 1979 Meaning and use. Reidel.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mcgowan, M.-K.
2003 Conversational exercitives and the force of pornography. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 155–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, F.
1981 Les énoncés performatifs. Minuit.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M.Z.
1982 The things we do with words : Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11 : 203–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, J.R.
1970 On declarative sentences. In R.A. Jakobs & P.S. Rosenbaum (eds.): 222–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, M.
1984 On illocutionary types. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001 Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. In A. Fetzer & C. Meierkord (eds.): 71–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
in press) Communicating citizenship in verbal interaction: principles of a speech act oriented discourse analysis. In H. Hausendorf & A. Bora (eds.)
Searle, J.R.
1964 What is a speech act? In M. Black (ed.): 120–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1968 Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. The Philosophical Review 77: 405–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1969 Speech acts. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975 Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.): 59–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976 A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979 Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983 Intentionality. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. & D. Vanderveken
1985 Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986 Relevance. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, P.F.
1950 On referring. Mind 59: 320–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1964 Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1973 Austin and ‘locutionary meaning’. In I. Berlin et al. : 46–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobin, Y.
(ed.) 1989 From sign to text. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Ch.
2000 Unshadowed Thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsohatzidis, S.L.
(ed.) 1994 Foundations of Speech Act Theory. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1972 Res cogitans. Cornell University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
1983 Review article on speech act classification. Language 59: 166–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985 What people say they do with words. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 Language on language. Papers in Pragmatics 3(2).  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warnock, G.J.
1973 Some types of performative utterances. In I. Berlin et al.: 69–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, E.
1994 Discourse, conversation, dialogue. In E. Weigand (ed.): 49–75.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 1994 Concepts of dialogue. Niemeyer.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1991 Cross-cultural pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1922 Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1953 Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1958 The Blue and Brown Books. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1969 über Gewissheit/On certainty. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D.
1976 Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Suhrkamp.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaefferer, D.
2001 Deconstructing a classical classification: a typological look at Searle’s concept of illocution type. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 55: 209–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Related articles: Analytical philosophy, Artificial intelligence, John L. Austin, émile Benveniste, Clinical pragmatics, Conversational implicature, Conversational logic, Indeterminacy and negotiation, Intentionality, Philosophy of language, Truthfulness
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue