Harold Garfinkel and pragmatics
Table of contents
This paper is a much-extended corollary to one I wrote as a tribute to the founder of ‘ethnomethodology’ (EM) after his death. My initial paper (Watson 2011) was essentially written and designed for sociologists who were not practitioners of EM and for non-sociologists. The present article focuses on the implications of Garfinkel’s work for pragmatics. It is far from the ‘last word’ on the issue, if there ever were such a thing, and it is intended to be an early move in what I hope will be an ongoing discussion.
References
Adato, A
Anderson, D.C. and Sharrock, W.W
Bilmes, J
Blommaert, J
Button, G
Carlin, A.P
Crews, F
Elias, N
Firth, A
Fuller, S
Garfinkel, H
n.d. Parsons Primer. Unpublished draft manuscript.
Garfinkel, H. and H. Sacks
Garfinkel, H. and D.L. Wieder
Giddens, A
Goldthorpe, J.H. and D. Lockwood
Hanks, William F., Sachiko Ide and Yasuhiro Katagiri
Heritage, J. and D.R. Watson
Hill, R.J. and K.S. Crittenden
Hinnenkamp, V
Lee, J.R.E
Liberman, K
Mertz, E. and J. Yovel
Mortensen, K
Pollner, M
Raymond, G and J. Heritage
Rose, E
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson
Schegloff, E.A
Sharrock, W.W. and D.C. Anderson
Silverman, D. and J. Gubrium
Silverstein, M
Sormani, P
Turner, R
van Dijk, T
Verschueren, J
Watson, R
Watson, R. and A.P. Carlin
Watson, R. and J. Coulter
Watson, R. and E. Gastaldo
Wieder, D.L
Winkin, Y. and W. Leeds-Hurwitz