Emergent grammar

Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
Table of contents

Emergent grammar is based on the assumption that grammar is not a discrete set of rules that exist a priori, detached from the contexts of use, but rather, that grammar is provisional and that it emerges in discourse (Hopper 1987, 1988, 1998). This approach has been described by Hopper (1988: 118) in the following way:

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Becker, A.L.
1979 The figure a sentence makes: An interpretation of a classical Maly sentence. In T. Givón (ed.): 243–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & P. Hopper
(eds.) 2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, L.
2001 What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–161.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L.
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & M. Selting
(eds.) 2001 Studies in Interactional linguistics. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J.W.
1985 Competing Motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax: 343–365. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987 The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001a Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001b Discourse and Grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2: 47–87. L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B. & R. Jasperson
1995 A Syntactic Exploration of Repair in English Conversation. In P.W. Davis (ed.) Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes: 77–134. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1979 From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy. In T. Givón (ed.): 81–112.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999 Generativity and variation: The notion of ‘Rule of Grammar’ revisited. In B. Macwhinney (ed.) The Emergence of Language: 81–114. Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T
(ed.) 1979 Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
1979 The interactive construction of a sentence in everyday conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology: 97–122. Irvington.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. & M.H. Goodwin
1987 Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
1994 Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (ed.) Perspectives on Grammaticalization: 3–28. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. & E. Traugott
(eds.) Approaches to Grammaticalization John Benjamins  BoP
Helasvuo, M.-L.
2001a Syntax in the Making. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001b Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.): 25–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
forthcoming) Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-Constructions. Santa Barbara Working Papers in Linguistics. University of California.
Hopper, P.J.
1979 Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.): 213–242.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987 Emergent grammar. Papers of the 13th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistic Society: 139–157. Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988 Emergent Grammar and the A Priori Grammar Postulate. In D. Tannen (ed.) Linguistics in Context: 117–134. Ablex. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997 Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language & Communication 17: 93–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998 Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: 155–175. Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & S.A. Thompson
1980 Transitivity in Grammar and in Discourse. Language 56: 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J.S.A. Thompson
1984 The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60: 703–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E.
2004 Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
1987 On the status of SVO sentences in spoken French discourse. In R. Tomlin (ed.) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse: 217–261. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988 Presentational cleft construction in spoken French. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.) Clause combining in grammar and discourse: 135–179. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: A Theory of Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
1991 The role of motivation in the emergence of grammatical categories: the grammaticization of subjects. In B. Heine & E. Traugott (eds.) Vol. II: 159–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, T. & S.A. Thompson
1995 What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. Davis (ed.) Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes: 213–271. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ÖstmanJ.-O.
1981 You know: A Discourse Functional Approach. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
1979 The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation. In T. Givón (ed.): 261–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996 Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.) Interaction and Grammar: 52–133. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheibman, J.
2001 Local Patterns of Subjectivity in Person and Verb Type in American English Conversation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.): 61–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1991 Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorjonen, M.-L.
2001 Responding in Conversation. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, S.A. & P.J. Hopper
2001 Transitivity and Clause Structure in Conversation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.): 27–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, S.A. & A. Mulac
1991 A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In B. Heine & E. Traugott (eds.) Vol. II: 313–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue