Contextualism

Claudia Bianchi
Table of contents

Contextualism is a view about meaning, semantic content and truth-conditions, bearing significant consequences for the characterisation of explicit and implicit content, the decoding/inferring distinction and the semantics/pragmatics interface. According to the traditional perspective in semantics (called “literalism” or “semantic minimalism”), it is possible to attribute truth-conditions to a sentence independently of any context of utterance, i.e. in virtue of its meaning alone. We must then distinguish between the proposition literally expressed by a sentence (“what is said” by the sentence, its literal truth-conditions) and the implicit meaning of the sentence (“what is implicated” by a speaker uttering the sentence). Over the past forty years, however, an increasing number of linguists and philosophers have begun to underline the phenomenon of semantic underdetermination: the encoded meaning of the sentence employed by a speaker underdetermines the proposition explicitly expressed by an utterance of that sentence. According to the extreme version of this perspective – labelled “radical contextualism” – no sentence of a natural language expresses a complete proposition, or has fixed truth-conditions, even when unambiguous and devoid of indexicals. A sentence expresses a proposition only when completed and enriched with pragmatic constituents that do not correspond to any syntactic element of the sentence and yet are part of its semantic interpretation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Austin, J.
1961 Philosophical Papers. J. Urmson & G. Warnock (eds.) 1979 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, K.
2001 You don’t say? Synthèse 128: 15–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 Seemingly semantic intuitions. In J. Keim Campbell, M. O’ Rourke & D. Shier (eds.) Meaning and Truth: 21–33. Seven Bridges Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004 Minding the Gap. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A.
2002 Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105–34.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, C.
2003 How to Refer: Objective Context vs. Intentional Context. In P. Blackburn et al. (eds.) Modeling and Using Context, CONTEXT ‘03, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2680: 54–65. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006 ‘Nobody loves me’: Quantification and context. Philosophical Studies 130: 377–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009 Pragmatica cognitiva. I meccanismi della comunicazione. Laterza. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 2004 The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. CSLI Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borg, E.
2004 Minimal Semantics. Clarendon Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007 Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 339–359. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelen, H. & E. Lepore
2005 Insensitive Semantics. A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R.
2002 Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004a Relevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction. In L.R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics: 633–656. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004b Truth-Conditional Content and Conversational Implicature. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 65–100.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, E.
2007 Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism. Pragmatics and Cognition (1): 115–137.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, E. & J. Dokic
2007 Sense and Insensibility Or Where Minimalism Meets Contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 169–193. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia-Carpintero, M. & M. Kölbel
(eds.) 2008 Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauker, C.
1997 Domain of Discourse. Mind 106: 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003 Words without meaning. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. & J. Moise
1997 Pragmatics in Understanding What is Said. Cognition 62: 51–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.
1989 Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan: 565–614. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kölbel, M.
2008 Introduction: Motivations for Relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (eds.): 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macfarlane, J.
2005 Making Sense of Relative Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007 Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 240–250. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009 Nonindexical Contextualism. Synthese 166: 231–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, J.
1986 Thought without Representation. In J. Perry (ed.) 1993 The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays: 205–218. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998 Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In A. Aliseda, R. Van Gabeek & D. Westerstahl (eds.) Computing Natural Language: 1–11. CSLI Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Predelli, S.
2005a Contexts. Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language. Oxford University Press.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005b Painted Leaves, Context, and Semantic Analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, F.
1993 Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995 The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207–232.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001 What is Said. Synthese 128: 75–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004a Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004b ‘What is said’ and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 45–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007 Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008 Moderate Relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (eds.): 41–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisa, M.
2009 Contextualism without incompleteness. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5: 55–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.
1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1980 The Background of Meaning. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics: 221–232. D. Reidel Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992 The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986/1995 Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanley, J.
2000 Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanley, J. & Z. Szabò
2000 On Quantifier Domain Restriction. Mind and Language 15(2): 219–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabò, Z.G.
2006 Sensitivity training. Mind and Language 21(1): 31–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 2005 Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, K.
2001 Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus. Synthese 128: 45–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Ch.
1975 Saying and Understanding. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Ch
1981 The True and the False: the Domain of Pragmatics. Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Ch.
1985 On What Is Strictly Speaking True. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187–229.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996 Meaning's Role in Truth. Mind 105: 451–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Ch
1997 Pragmatics. In B. Hale & C. Wright (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language: 87–107. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, K.
(ed.) 1999 The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, vol. 1). Elsevier.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waismann, F.
1940 Verifiability. In A. Flew (ed.) 1951 Logic and Language. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953 Philosophische Untersuchungen. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue