Control phenomena

Benjamin Lyngfelt
Table of contents

Control, as the term is generally understood in syntax, concerns the interpretation of non-finite clauses such as infinitivals or gerunds. It may be defined as a coreference relation between the understood subject of a non-finite clause and some other element that provides its interpretation. This element is called its controller. Some different types of controllers are illustrated in (1):

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Barrie, M.
2007 Control and wh-infinitivals. >In Davies & Dubinsky eds.: 263–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
1982 Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343–434. Also published in J. Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P. & R. Jackendoff
2005 Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, W.D. & S. Dubinsky
2004 The grammar of raising and control. A course in syntactic argumentation. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 71.) Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007 New horizons in the analysis of control and raising. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S.C.
1997 The theory of Functional Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, D.
1988 On obligatory control. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 27–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodluck, H. & D. Behne
1992 Development in control and extraction. In J. Weissenborn & H. Goodluck & T. Roeper eds.: 151–171 Theoretical issues in language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grinder, J.T.
1970 Super equi-NP deletion. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 6: 297–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, N.
1999 Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawasaki, N.
1993 Control and arbitrary interpretation in English. Diss. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Dissertation Abstracts International ,54/2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, I.
2000 Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. (Studies in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 51.) Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, B.
2000 OT semantics and control. Rutgers Optimality Archive 411. http://​ruccs​.rutgers​.edu​/roa​.html. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 Kontroll i svenskan. Den optimala tolkningen av infinitivers tankesubjekt. [‘Control in Swedish: The optimal interpretation of implicit subjects in infinitival clauses.’] Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M.R.
1983 On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.
1967 The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sag, I.A. & C. Pollard
1991 An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67: 63–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, E.
1980 Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992 Adjunct control. In R. Larson et al. eds. Control and grammar: 297–322 (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 48.) Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue