Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:2 (2020) ► pp.290–310
‘Effortful’, ‘needy’ and ‘freeloader’
Constructions of unemployed people’s deservingness in Finnish parliamentary discussions
Published online: 26 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19056.tar
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19056.tar
Abstract
This article provides a rhetorical discourse analysis of constructions of unemployed people’s deservingness. Data
consist of transcripts from Finnish parliament members debating the ‘Activation Model for Unemployment Security’, from December
2017. In the analysis, three discursive constructions of unemployed people’s deservingness were identified: an ‘effortful citizen
lacking control’, a ‘needy citizen deserving the welfare state’s reciprocal acts’ and an ‘undeserving freeloader in need of an
attitude adjustment’. Analysis focuses on how deservingness and undeservingness are rhetorically accomplished and treated as
factual in parliament members’ accounts. The analysis pays particular attention to the question of how speakers build factuality
through the management of categories, extreme case formulations, ‘truth talk’ and maximisation and minimisation strategies. The
results reflect the negotiated nature of deservingness as well as varying constructions of unemployed people’s responsibility in
the contemporary Nordic welfare state context.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous literature on unemployed people’s deservingness
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Data analysis
- 4.1The ‘effortful’ citizen lacking control
- 4.2A needy citizen deserving the welfare state’s reciprocal acts
- 4.3The ‘freeloader’ in need of an attitude adjustment
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
References
References (41)
Appelbaum, Lauren D. 2001. “The Influence of Perceived Deservingness on Policy Decisions Regarding Aid to the Poor.” Political Psychology 221: 419–442.
Battle, Brittany. 2018. “Deservingness, Deadbeat Dads, and Responsible Fatherhood: Child Support Policy and Rhetorical Conceptualizations of Poverty, Welfare, and the Family.” Symbolic Interaction 411: 443–464.
Blomberg, Helena, Johanna Kallio, Olli Kangas, Christian Kroll, and Mikko Niemelä. 2017. “Social Assistance Deservingness and Policy Measures: Attitudes of Finnish Politicians, Administrators and Citizens.” In The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare: Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, edited by Wim van Oorschot, Femke Roosma, Bart Meuleman, and Tim Reeskens, 209–224. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Buss, Christopher. 2019. “Public Opinion towards Targeted Labour Market Policies. A Vignette Study on the Perceived Deservingness of the Unemployed.” Journal of European Social Policy 29 (2): 228–240.
Esmark, Anders, and Sarah R. Schoop. 2017. “Deserving Social Benefits? Political Framing and Media Framing of ‘Deservingness’ in Two Welfare Reforms in Denmark.” Journal of European Social Policy 27 (5): 417–432.
Every, Danielle, and Martha Augoustinos. 2007. “Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers.” Discourse & Society 18 (4): 411–436.
Gibson, Stephen. 2009. “The Effortful Citizen: Discursive Social Psychology and Welfare Reform.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 191: 393–410.
Gordon, Elyse. 2013. “Under-Served and Un-Deserving: Youth Empowerment Programs, Poverty Discourses and Subject Formation.” Geoforum 501: 107–116.
Guetskow, Joshua. 2010. “Beyond Deservingness: Congressional Discourse on Poverty, 1964–1996.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 6291: 173–197.
HE 124/2017 [Governmental Proposal on Amendment of Unemployment Security and Few Other Acts]
Ilie, Cornelia. 2010a. “Introduction”. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010b. “Identity Co-Construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2016. “Parliamentary Discourse and Deliberative Rhetoric.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of European Concept, edited by Pasi Ihalainen, Ilie Cornelia, and Kari Palonen, 91–98. New York: Berghahn Books.
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel. 2010. “Rhetorical Strategies in the British and Spanish Parliaments.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 329–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kangas, Olli, and Laura Kalliomaa-Puha. 2019. “The “Activation Model” in the Finnish Unemployment Protection System.” ESPN Flash Report 2019/05. Accessed August 28, 2019. [URL]
Katz, Michael. 2013. Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. Oxford University Press. ProQuest Ebook Central. [URL]
Kissová, Lenka. 2018. “The Production of (Un)Deserving and (Un)Acceptable: Shifting Representations of Migrants within Political Discourse in Slovakia.” East European Politics and Societies 32 (4): 743–766.
Larsen, Christian A. 2008a. “The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–168.
2008b. “The Political Logic of Labour Market Reforms and Popular Images of Target Groups.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (1): 50–63.
Marston, Greg. 2008. “A War on the Poor: Constructing Welfare and Work in Twenty-First Century.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (4): 359–370.
Meanwell, Emily, and Julie Swando. 2013. “Who Deserves Good Schools? Cultural Categories of Worth and School Finance Reform.” Sociological Perspectives 56 (4): 495–522.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. 2019. “Draft proposal on Amendment regarding the Activation Model.” Accessed August 28, 2019, [URL]
Møller, Marie Ø., and Deborah Stone. 2013. “Disciplining Disability under Danish Active Labour Market Policy.” Social Policy & Administration 471: 586–604.
Monforte, Pierre, Leah Bassel, and Kamran Khan. 2019. “Deserving Citizenship? Exploring Migrants’ Experiences of the ‘Citizenship Test’ Process in the United Kingdom.” The British Journal of Sociology 70 (1): 24–43.
Nygård, Mikael. 2007. “Welfare or Workfare? Partisan Re/constructions of Finnish Unemployment Security in the Era of Retrenchment.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (1): 29–50.
Patrick, Ruth. 2012. “Work as the Primary ‘Duty’ of the Responsible Citizen: a Critique of this Work-centric Approach.” People, Place & Policy Online 6 (1): 5–15.
Pekonen, Kyösti. 2008. “Two Versions of Representative Talk in the Finnish Parliament.” In The Parliamentary Style of Politics, edited by Suvi Soininen, and Tapani Turkka, 208–229. Helsinki: Helsinki University Print.
Pomeranz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimising Claims.” Human Studies 91: 219–229.
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage Publications.
Rowlingson, Karen, and Stuart Connor. 2011. “The ‘Deserving’ Rich? Inequality, Morality and Social Policy.” Journal of Social Policy 40 (3): 437–462.
Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.
Seu, Irene. 2016. “‘The Deserving’: Moral Reasoning and Ideological Dilemmas in Public Responses to Humanitarian Communications.” British Journal of Social Psychology 551: 739–755.
Slothuus, Rune. 2007. “Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (3): 323–344.
Stone, Deborah. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2000. “Parliamentary Debates.” In Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Teun A. van Dijk, 45–78. Kalgenfurt: Drava Verlag.
van Oorschot, Wim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perception among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1): 23–42.
. 2000. “Who Should Get What and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public.” Policy and Politics 28 (1): 33–48.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
