Cover not available

Article published In: Fifty years of agenda-setting research: Volume II
Edited by Chris J. Vargo
[The Agenda Setting Journal 3:1] 2019
► pp. 23–42

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Ethnic nationalism and gatekeeping in the European media

Linking agenda setting, agenda building, and agenda indexing

 | University of Florida
 | University of Florida
 | University of Florida
 | University of Florida
 | University of Florida
Published online: 2 January 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18014.tar
Abstract
This study explores relationships between agenda building, agenda indexing (reflected through share of voice as the key variable), and agenda-setting effects, measured through the combination of public opinion survey data and quantitative content analysis. It conceptually distinguishes between the three metrics often used interchangeably in the professional discourse by advertising and media practitioners – share of voice, share of influence, and share of conversation – and explores how they could be applied in political communication research to become useful tools for agenda-setting researchers. The results of the study indicate that an increased level of nationalism serves as a significant predictor for EU policy support through the pathway of decreased pro-EU sentiment, which, on the agenda level, is reflective of pro-nationals being less supportive of the EU policies and the idea of European integration.
Article outline
  • Literature review
    • Gatekeeping theory: News production as a social process
    • Agenda indexing: Source selection as a political process
    • The European Commission as an agenda sponsor for the national media of the EU member-states
    • Nationalism
    • Share of voice, share of conversation and share of influence as media market metrics
  • Method
    • Sentiment toward the EU
    • Approval of the EU policies
    • Nationalism
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References
References (57)
References
Anderson, S. (2013, April 29). Share of conversation reveals more than share of voice. Retrieved from [URL]
Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 41, 103–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borden, J. (2016). Effects of national identity in transnational crises: Implications of social identity theory for attribution and crisis management. International Journal of Communication, 101, 377–397.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1971). The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. The Journal of Politics, 331, 892–915. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cui, X. (2018). Emotional contagion or symbolic cognition? A social identity perspective on media events. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(1), 91–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, J. D. (2012, May 21). Four steps to measure your brand’s share of voice on Twitter. Retrieved from [URL]
Demertzis, N., Papathanassopoulos, S., & Armenakis, A. (1999). Media and nationalism: The Macedonian question. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(3), 26–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ding, I., & Hlavac, M. (2017). “Right” choice: Restorative nationalism and right-wing populism in Central and Eastern Europe. Chinese Political Science Review, 21, 427–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Sink, A., & Mastro, D. (2017). Evidence of linguistic intergroup bias in U.S. print news coverage of immigration. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 361, 462–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Druckman, D. (1994). Nationalism, patriotism, and group loyalty: A social psychological perspective. Mershon International Studies Review, 38(Suppl. 1), 43–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eagle, L., Kitchen, P. J., & Rose, L. (2005). Defending brand advertising’s share of voice: A mature market(s) perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 131, 65–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
European Commission. (2016, June 16). European Commission. Retrieved from [URL]
Europe’s rising far right: A guide to the most prominent parties. (2016, June 13). The New York Times. Retrieved from [URL]
Federal Trust. (2010, January 29). Legitimacy and the European Union. Retrieved from [URL]
Fox, J. E., & Vermeersch, P. (2010). Backdoor nationalism. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 511, 325–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. New York, NY: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorham, B. (2006). News media’s relationship with stereotyping: The linguistic intergroup bias in response to news crime. Journal of Communication, 561, 289–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, L., Vu, H., & McCombs, M. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects exploring the third level of agenda setting. Revista de Comunicación, 111, 51–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, F., & Christensen, B. (2005). Share of voice/share of market and long-term advertising effects. International Journal of Advertising, 241, 297–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegedûs, I. (2011). Media representations of EU matters in national media systems: The Hungarian case. In M. Sükösd & K. Jakubowicz (Eds.), Media, nationalism and European identities (NED-New edition, 1, pp. 74–118). Retrieved from [URL]
Kim, J. Y., Kiousis, S., & Xiang, Z. (2015). Agenda building and agenda setting in business: Corporate reputation attributes. Corporate Reputation Review, 181, 25–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Xiang, Z., & Kiousis, S. (2011). Agenda building effects by 2008 presidential candidates on global media coverage and public opinion. Public Relations Review, 371, 109–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, A. D. (1991). Culture, globalization and the world system: Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinnvall, C. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 251, 741–767. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiousis, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2010). The White House and public relations: Examining the linkages between presidential communications and public opinion. Public Relations Review, 361, 7–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 11, 5–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, K. (2016, June 27). Frexit, Nexit or Oexit? Who will be next to leave the EU. The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL]
Mancini, P., & Mazzoni, M. (2015). Countries still matter. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The Euro crisis in the media: Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European institutions, (pp. 177–195.) London, UK: I.B. Tauris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 361, 176–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M., Holbert, L., Kiousis, S., & Wanta, W. (2011). The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 741, 703–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, D. (2005). Is EU media coverage biased? European Affairs, 6(1–2). Retrieved from [URL]
Nationalist surge challenges Europe. (2016, May 23). BBC News. Retrieved from [URL]
Nicholls, S. B., & Rice, R. E. (2017). A dual-identify model of responses to deviance in online groups: Integrating social identity theory and expectancy violations theory. Communication Theory, 271, 243–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nienstedt, H.-W., Kepplinger, H. M., & Quiring, O. (2015). What went wrong and why? Roots, responsibilities, and solutions of the Euro Crisis in the European newspapers. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The Euro Crisis in the media: Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European institutions (pp. 19–44). London, UK: I.B. Tauris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogneva, M. (2010a, August 15). 7 Steps to measuring your brand’s social media health. Retrieved from [URL]
(2010b, July 31). What is share of conversation and how do I measure it? Retrieved from [URL]
O’Neill, A. (2010, November 15). Moving from ‘share of voice’ to ‘share of influence’. Retrieved from [URL]
Oppiah, O., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Alter, S. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news framing. Journal of Communication, 631, 517–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, B. (2009, October 31). Why share of conversation trumps share of voice. Retrieved from [URL]
Penn, C. (2016, March 14). Measure share of engagement instead of share of voice. Retrieved from [URL]
Pesse, M. (2007). Session 2: addressing the trust issue: from share of voice to share of care. Journal of Medical Marketing, 7(4), 303–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgement of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (2005). Gatekeeping theory: An evolution. Retrieved from [URL]
Rooduijn, M. (2014). The mesmerising message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies, 621, 726–744. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, N.Y: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (1991). National identity. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2016, June 15). How to measure share of voice: PPC, SEO and social media. Retrieved from [URL]
Soloski, J. (1989). Sources and channels of local news. Journalism Quarterly, 661, 864–870. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2017). Political public relations and mediatization: The strategies of news management. In P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Eds.), How political actors use the media (pp. 63–83). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tedesco, J. C. (2011). Political public relations and agenda-building. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations: Principles and applications (pp. 75–94). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trautsch, J. M. (2016). The origins and nature of American nationalism. National Identities, 181, 289–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varga, P. J. (2011). Pan-European media: Attempts and limitations. In M. Sükösd & K. Jakubowicz (Eds.), Media, Nationalism and European Identities (NED-New edition, 1, pp. 120–151). Retrieved from [URL]
Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 561, 88–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wanta, W. (1997). The public and the national agenda: How people learn about important issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolski, C. (2016, February 29). Beyond vanity metrics: Share of influence vs. share of voice. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Roman, Nataliya, Barbara Myslik & Berrin Beasley
2025. “Unwanted guests” or welcomed neighbors? Portrayals of Ukrainian refugees in Russian, Polish, and UK news coverage. International Communication Gazette 87:5 ► pp. 466 ff. DOI logo
Romanova, Ekaterina, Sofiya Tarasevich, Long Xiao, Hadeel Alhaddadeh & Spiro Kiousis
2025. Gender, Politics, and the Glass Ceiling: Comparative Analysis of Male and Female Politicians’ Agenda-Building Efforts in the U.S. Primaries. International Journal of Strategic Communication 19:3 ► pp. 404 ff. DOI logo
Arceneaux, Phillip, Osama Albishri, Joshua Anderson & Spiro Kiousis
2024. Dynamics of Campaign, Press, and Public Discourse in Electoral Politics. Journalism Studies 25:2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Arceneaux, Phillip, Osama Albishri & Spiro Kiousis
2024. How Candidates Influence Each Other in Electoral Politics: Intercandidate Agenda-Building in Florida’s 2018 Midterm Election. Journal of Political Marketing 23:4 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Ruqin & Jian Xu
2024. It’s not an encyclopedia, it’s a market of agendas: Decentralized agenda networks between Wikipedia and global news media from 2015 to 2020. New Media & Society 26:11 ► pp. 6235 ff. DOI logo
Shaughnessy, Brittany, Osama Albishri, Phillip Arceneaux, Nader Dagher & Spiro Kiousis
2023. Morality on the ballot: strategic issue salience and affective moral intuitions in the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Communication Management 27:4 ► pp. 582 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue